What new research on the Cascadia fault finds about the Pacific Northwest’s ‘big one’ - The Daily Chronicle (2024)

Riya Sharma, Andrew Miller / oregonlive.com (TNS)

Just off the Pacific Northwest coast amid record-breaking heat in 2021, researchers braved oddly cold, stormy seas to study another threat to the region — earthquakes and tsunamis. The team of about 50 remained onboard the 235-foot vessel for 41 continuous days.

Their findings — leading to a study released Friday in the journal Science Advances — shed new light on earthquakes. With this new, mostly unexplored data, researchers will be better equipped to model earthquakes and tsunamis — and prepare the Pacific Northwest for the eventual “big one.”

Tectonic plates fragment the Earth’s crust in a delicate dance of collision and separation. In the Northwest, the smaller Juan de Fuca plate is sliding under the North American plate along a roughly 600-mile-long subduction zone. Eventually, researchers say the Juan de Fuca plate may entirely submerge under the North American plate.

The Juan de Fuca plate’s collision has over time given rise to the mountain ranges and volcanoes defining the Northwest. But when tension builds at the collision, the crust can suddenly snap — causing earthquakes and tsunamis. In 1700, a 9.0 quake struck the region, causing immense destruction and a tsunami that reached Japan.

Scientists can’t predict when earthquakes will happen, but they can try to better understand the dynamics surrounding them. This increased understanding can help inform policymakers making building codes, or modelers who map out potential earthquake scenarios.

So the team of scientists set out to make one of the most comprehensive maps of an underwater subduction zone to-date.

Study co-author Suzanne Carbotte said their ship would regularly emit pulses of sound, which would then hit the ocean floor. The sound would then bounce back and a series of microphones on a 9-mile-long cable would collect the sound — allowing researchers to map the ocean floor’s topography and features under the surface.

But Carbotte, a marine geophysicist and professor at Columbia University, said that the team faced several challenges in the data acquisition process. Crab pots damaged the scientists’ equipment — and at one point, the specialized cable broke off the ship entirely. The cable, equipped with GPS and airbags, eventually floated to the surface where the scientists recovered it.

After they returned from the ocean, researchers dove into the data and pored over preliminary conclusions.

In their initial findings, they confirmed the existence of horizontal faults cutting through the subduction zone, splitting it into segments, Carbotte said. Depending on how many segments are involved in an earthquake, the earthquake’s strength can vary.

Another major result: the geometry of the Juan de Fuca plate that runs along the state of Washington to Vancouver Island is unexpectedly “smooth.” Carbotte said the area’s relative flatness means that when tension builds up, it builds up over a larger area. This can make snaps of that tension more powerful.

“We could have a very, very destructive earthquake from just that Washington segment,” she said.

However, Carbotte said that this improved data on the geometries and features of the subduction zone will help earthquake modelers, who will be able to map scenarios in much more detail.

The Cascadia subduction zone is distinct from others because of the variability in its geometry — flat in places like around Washington, while steeper in other areas, said Lydia Staisch, a Portland-based research geologist for the United States Geological Survey. She also noted the presence of sediment along the fault that can impact earthquake characteristics.

“What the researchers have been able to do with this is show, with pretty good confidence, an improved understanding of what the Cascadia subduction zone plate geometry is,” Staisch said. The dataset will be powerful for understanding how earthquakes change along the subduction zone and through time, she said.

Staisch said that this dataset can lead to a host of different directions for future research.

Though the severity and timing are impossible to predict, a large earthquake would devastate the Northwest. Many buildings in the region are not up to code and coastal communities are unprepared for tsunamis, said Bill Steele, an outreach director with the Pacific Northwest Seismic Network.

“We’re poorly prepared; we still have some older structures that aren’t going to do well in the shaking,” he said.

“Hopefully it won’t happen for 100 years or so,” he added.

There is some progress, Steele said. Some coastal communities are constructing vertical evacuation structures for tsunamis. Construction is also improving. But he said earthquake and tsunami-proofing is happening slowly.

The Oregonian/OregonLive has a map of Portland metro buildings by the building codes they were constructed under, and a map of unreinforced masonry buildings — which are vulnerable in earthquakes.

©2024 Advance Local Media LLC. Visit oregonlive.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

What new research on the Cascadia fault finds about the Pacific Northwest’s ‘big one’ - The Daily Chronicle (2024)

FAQs

What are the predictions for the Cascadia fault? ›

Currently, scientists are predicting that there is about a 37% chance that a megathrust earthquake of 7.1+ magnitude in this fault zone will occur in the next 50 years.

What evidence led scientists to conclude that Cascadia had been hit by large earthquakes many times in the past? ›

The thinning lowered the coast enough for tides to drown coastal forests. Today, ghostly tree trunks provide natural clues that the huge earthquakes occurred. Earth scientists have found similar, much older remains of flooded forests in Cascadia.

What evidence is there for the Cascadia earthquake? ›

Geologic and natural history show that on this date, a great earthquake caused the coast along the subduction zone to rapidly subside three to six feet (one to two meters) and generated a large tsunami. Evidence for this and other historical earthquakes and tsunamis is found in offshore submarine landslide deposits.

What is the big one earthquake prediction in Oregon? ›

According to the Oregon Resilience Plan, there is a 7-15% chance of a magnitude 9.0 earthquake within the next 50 years.

How far inland will the Cascadia tsunami reach in Oregon? ›

The waves could be 30-40 feet (9-12 m) in height when they hit the coast but some models suggest they could reach 100 feet (30 m), and in many parts of the coast they would flood up to 10 miles (16 km) inland.

Where will Cascadia earthquake hit hardest? ›

The highest density of tremor activity in Cascadia occurs from northern Washington into southern Vancouver Island, and in northern California.

What evidence was used to conclude that there was a gigantic earthquake in the Pacific Northwest 300 years ago? ›

How could scientists know for sure? American researchers used carbon dating on the spruce, peat and fossilized plants. Sitka spruce as far apart as southern Washington and Northern California died from the high waters during the same few decades — sometime between 1695 and 1720.

How do scientists know about the 1700 Cascadia earthquake? ›

Scientists from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) have leveraged sediment core mapping and sophisticated computer modeling to shed new light on the last great earthquake and tsunami along the Cascadia Subduction Zone in 1700 CE.

What would a 9.0 earthquake do to California? ›

A catastrophic M9. 0 CSZ earthquake would cause violent ground shaking in several coastal areas in Del Norte, Humboldt, and Mendocino counties and generate a tsunami with estimated wave heights of between 5 and 15 meters (16 – 49 ft.) in Crescent City, and up to 12 meters (39 ft.) in Eureka/Humboldt Bay.

How overdue is the big one? ›

According to researchers at San Diego State University and the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, the San Andreas fault has a history of unleashing massive earthquakes every 180 years, give or take 40 years. As of now, it's been about 300 years since the last really 'Big One' shook Southern California.

How likely is the big one? ›

According to USGS there is a 70% chance that one or more quakes of a magnitude 6.7 or larger will occur before the year 2030. Two earthquakes have previously been data-classified as big ones; The San Francisco quake in 1906 with a magnitude of 7.8 and the Fort Tejon quake in 1857 that hit 7.9.

How long would a 9.0 earthquake last? ›

A magnitude 9.0 earthquake can last for five minutes or longer, and the amount of energy released is about 1,000 times greater than that of a 7.0. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the most powerful quakes could leave few if any masonry buildings standing, destroy bridges and toss objects into the air.

Which state has the highest odds of a major earthquake? ›

California has more earthquakes that cause damage than any other state. Alaska and California have the most earthquakes (not human-induced).

When was the 9.0 earthquake? ›

On 11 March 2011, at 14:46 JST (05:46 UTC), a Mw 9.0–9.1 undersea megathrust earthquake occurred in the Pacific Ocean, 72 km (45 mi) east of the Oshika Peninsula of the Tōhoku region. It lasted approximately six minutes and caused a tsunami.

Will we know when the big one is coming? ›

No one can predict with certainty when the next massive earthquake— aka “The Big One”—will rock Southern California. But new research suggests it might be sooner than we previously thought.

How overdue is the Cascadia fault Line? ›

Current data suggest that the Pacific Northwest is overdue for a potentially 9-plus magnitude CSZ earthquake and subsequent tsunami, like those that ravaged Chile in 2010 and Japan in 2011. Scientists say there is a 37 percent chance of a CSZ earthquake of 7 magnitude or higher in the next 50 years.

What areas will be affected by the Cascadia fault? ›

North Coast

The Cascadia Subduction Zone stretches underneath the Humboldt-Del Norte county region, extending from Cape Mendocino all the way up through the Pacific Northwest. This fault zone is capable of generating a magnitude 9 (or larger) earthquake on average every 500 years. The last such event was in 1700.

How far inland will the Cascadia earthquake be felt? ›

The shaking will be felt for hundreds of miles - from the coast all the way inland to Boise, Idaho, even to the southeast toward Sacramento in California.

What are the odds that a major quake will strike Cascadia in our lifetimes? ›

As pressure builds between the Juan de Fuca plate and the North American Plate, Oregon's Office of Emergency Management says there's about a 37% chance of a megathrust earthquake in the Cascadia Subduction Zone in the next 50 years.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Clemencia Bogisich Ret

Last Updated:

Views: 6635

Rating: 5 / 5 (80 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Clemencia Bogisich Ret

Birthday: 2001-07-17

Address: Suite 794 53887 Geri Spring, West Cristentown, KY 54855

Phone: +5934435460663

Job: Central Hospitality Director

Hobby: Yoga, Electronics, Rafting, Lockpicking, Inline skating, Puzzles, scrapbook

Introduction: My name is Clemencia Bogisich Ret, I am a super, outstanding, graceful, friendly, vast, comfortable, agreeable person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.